Key actions require a pointer
Keyboard users may be unable to reach controls, understand focus, or complete important flows.
Services ACCESSIBILITY TESTINGCIPHERINITY QUALITY ENGINEERING
Make accessibility part of product validation.
Evaluate important user journeys for accessibility barriers and provide actionable findings that help teams improve inclusive access.
THE CHALLENGES
Address the risks behind the work.
Accessibility issues can make content and actions difficult or impossible to use for people with different access needs and assistive technologies.
Content lacks programmatic context
Weak semantics, names, and relationships can make interfaces harder to interpret with assistive technology.
Forms do not explain errors
Labels, instructions, validation messages, and focus handling may not support successful completion.
Visual cues are difficult to perceive
Contrast, focus visibility, and colour-only signals can obscure information or interactive state.
SERVICES AVAILABLE FOR YOUR ENGAGEMENT
Focused expertise for your product.
Scope the work around your system, delivery context, and quality objectives.
Accessibility Assessment and Testing
Review selected pages and workflows using agreed accessibility criteria and a combination of manual checks and suitable tools. Scope and reporting can be aligned with WCAG-oriented evaluation where appropriate; this is testing support, not official certification or a guarantee of conformance.
Scope and criteria
Agree the product areas, supported environments, user journeys, evaluation criteria, and limitations before assessment.
Keyboard Navigation Testing
Check logical focus order, visible focus, keyboard operability, modal and menu behaviour, and completion of core workflows without a pointer.
Screen-Reader Compatibility Evaluation
Evaluate accessible names, roles, states, reading order, announcements, and interaction patterns using agreed screen-reader and browser combinations.
Semantic Structure and Form Accessibility
Review headings, landmarks, labels, instructions, error association, and status messaging so information and form interactions have meaningful structure.
Colour Contrast and Focus Visibility
Inspect text and interface contrast, focus indication, and non-colour cues against the evaluation criteria agreed for the engagement.
ENGAGEMENT APPROACH
Clear steps from scope to evidence.
We agree the scope and outputs with you before work begins, then keep findings traceable to the stated goals.
Agree scope
Select workflows, platforms, evaluation criteria, and any WCAG-oriented scope appropriate to the engagement.
Review access paths
Combine manual keyboard and assistive-technology checks with targeted tooling where useful.
Record barriers
Document steps, affected elements, expected and observed behaviour, and supporting evidence.
Prioritise remediation
Discuss user impact, reproducibility, and practical follow-up or retesting with the product team.
POSSIBLE DELIVERABLES
Evidence your team can use.
- Accessibility test scope, environments, and evaluation criteria
- Findings with affected journeys, steps, and supporting evidence
- Prioritised observations and remediation discussion points
- Retest notes for agreed fixes and limitations of the assessment
START A CONVERSATION
What quality challenge are you working through?
Tell us about the product, the risks you need to address, and your delivery goals.
Talk to our team